Yesterday was a strange day. It rained thoroughly and steadily. It thundered, it winded, it stayed blessedly far below 100 degrees (where it'd been hovering for the previous far too many days). So we celebrated as Newmans are wont to celebrate stormy weather... by going to Borders.
(And a side note about what happened when we went to Borders: on the front table, the new book by 9/11-widow-insulting harpy Ann Coulter was prominently displayed. A woman was actually thumbing through this foul volume. I said to Fisher as we passed, loudishly I suppose, "I don't know why they have to mess up the front of the store with this crap." Fisher told me a few seconds later, "Mama, when you said that, that lady said 'But I like it!' " God, I can't wait to get out of this misbegotten town.)
The last several times we went to the bookstore, something weird happened: I didn't purchase a damn thing. So yesterday, I sorta kinda made up for it by picking up not one, but three fantasy novels: First Betrayal by Patricia Bray, Raven's Shadow
by Patricia Briggs and Medalon
by Jennifer Fallon (all of whose work I've read & enjoyed before). But in the process of picking out these three, there were many (O, many, dear reader) which I picked up, then put down again promptly. And having just re-read Self-Editing for Fiction Writers
, the reasons why I decided against these books were perhaps more sharply delineated than usual in my mind.
So in the interests of Improving the State of the Genre (ha ha) and Expressing My Cranky Self (indeed!), I hereby present to you this list of
Reasons to Put a (Fantasy) Book Back on the Shelf
- The blurb on the back makes any reference to Saving the World with the assistance of a Magic(k)al Widget.
- The title contains the words Sword, Ring, Crown, Blade (if you mean "sword," say "sword," dammit), King, Lord, Dark or Fate. Even if your novel is about the Lord Blade of Ring-land and his beloved Sword Crown battling the Dark King of Fate... puh-leeze, think of something else to call the book. You ain't no Tolkien, and you probably ain't no George R.R. Martin either. And they are the only ones who can reliably get away with trotting out these overused words.
- Any of the characters have names of four syllables or more. "Camaleiya" is OK as a summons uttered by Kira in the Dark Crystal. It is not OK as a name that recurs on Every. Freakin'. Page.
- Any of the characters have apostrophes in their names. This may be forgivable if someone is named something like D'Artagnan or L'Amour... but F'ri'saille is right out.
- Any of the characters' names have weird unnatural combinations of letters unlike those any found in any earthly tongue. It doesn't sound mystical or Elvish, you twerp... it sounds as though some drunkard has been pounding on a keyboard. Take this Sfiglathiearhnel and shove it.
- In one paragraph, one character "gasps" something; and in the next paragraph, another character "grunts" something. Is this a suspenseful chapter, or a low-rent Vivid orgy?
- In the same vein... characters repeatedly "respond," "demand," "deny" or "wonder" their dialogue. You get ONE of these per chapter, and even that's pushing it, buddy. They can "say" things. They can occasionally "ask." And, since I'm an Anne of Green Gables fan, they can "ejaculate" if they must. But THAT'S IT.
- That means no "hissing!" And for God's sake, no "smiling" your words! Go ahead, try it; it's freakin' biologically impossible.
- Adjectives are like Tribbles. They must be stomped and squished before they breed. Admittedly, they are kinda cute, and you might want to keep one or two around... but they must be separated at all times by vast gulfs of nouns and verbs.
- Adverbs are like cockroaches. They must be stomped and squished... and they are not cute, and you must not keep them around... for otherwise, for every one you see, there will be thousands more lurking stealthily, menacingly and defilingly behind every door.
- The book features a red-haired heroine.
- The book features a green-eyed heroine.
- Do you know how rare the above-mentioned genetic traits are? What's wrong with brown hair, brown eyes and brownish skin... as is proudly sported by probably more than 80% of the world's population? Or if you've gotta go with the Christmas colors theme... how about a red-eyed, green-haired heroine? Maybe she's a pot-smoking (or excessively tearful) backstroke champion.
- Faux-Elizabethan dialogue. And/or lofty, elevated speech. When Shakespeare did it, people actually talked like that (and if you'll pay attention, you'll see that only his nobly-born characters talk that way). When you do it, it sounds Stupid. And False. There will be no hie-ing, no forsoothing and only the very minimum of indeeding.
- Do you have people from two geographically disparate countries? Then they probably don't speak each other's language. Especially if one of them is a simple farm boy (who's really the bastard son of the Mighty King Rencesfrew) and the other is an illiterate but admirably stacked barmaid from a remote village. They CANNOT TALK TO EACH OTHER.
- On the same note: one can only say so much with "signs" and "pantomime." Maybe you can indicate that you want something to eat. Without the mutual understanding of a language such as ASL, you cannot indicate that you are a monk from the remote northern province of Foofle with an important message regarding the current whereabouts of the One True King.
- Honestly, do you really believe that monarchy is a valid, appropriate and laudable form of government? Dude, that's just creepy. Can't you think of something that doesn't involve "outdated imperialist dogma which perpetuates the economic and social differences in our society?" Try having "supreme executive power derive from a mandate from the masses" instead. Or at least, stop pretending that kings (at least the True-Born, non-usurper type) are holy and good and have the Lowly Peasants' best interests at heart. History shows us that kings are more likely to turn Lowly Peasants into tufted footstools than into members of their advisory councils.
- Please, please, please... don't let your doughty adventurers cross a mountain range in two days. On horseback. In the dead of winter. Without large sacks of fodder for their mounts. Or a pre-assembled collection of firewood.
- The word is "Magic." Not "Magick." Not "Majik." If you're a practicing Wiccan, you can call your spellcasting ceremonies anything you like. But if you're writing a book, please do us all a favor and leave off the extraneous "k."
- For God's sake, leave out the poetry. Leave out the children's nursery rhymes that oh-so-cleverly conceal the secret to defeating the Dark Sword Lord. Leave out the mysterious prophetic verses that could not possibly mystify any thinking person for longer than about four seconds. Leave out the Ancient Rimes of Woe that preface every chapter.
Thank you for your attention, and happy writing/publishing! Tomorrow I will list a few fantasy novels that cleverly manage to sidestep all these pitfalls and produce a Slamming Good Read instead. Won't that be nice?
Update: well, it wasn't "tomorrow" (is that such a surprise?), but I did get around to the list of fantasy books that don't suck.
I was just in Borders last night and bought nothing for myself. But I did buy my best friend 2 books (one of them "what would Bill Hicks say?"...are you familiar with Bill Hicks? If not, you should be, because you would love him) and I bought my dad a Dragonlance book, which I'm sure probably commits a few of the offenses on your list. Ha.
Posted by: Angi | June 09, 2006 at 10:45 AM
But isn't all that why it's called "fantasy"? In my fantasies, everyone has quadrisyllabic names. Like "Pumpernickel."
Posted by: Herm | June 09, 2006 at 11:35 AM
Love it! I'm sending the link to my husband the gamer! I swear, this is what happens when role players become writers.
Posted by: Jill S | June 10, 2006 at 11:56 AM
Go Molly you are my hero in more ways than you know!! Love ya Wanda
Posted by: Wanda E. Santiago | June 10, 2006 at 07:42 PM
I am a big Ann Coulter fan but I do think she was very disrespectful to those 9/11 widows. I wouldn't classify as anymore full of hate than say, Hillary Clinton...
Posted by: Suzanne | June 11, 2006 at 07:49 AM
As a natural redhead with natural green eyes, I take offense at one of your points... but I'll grant it nonetheless.
And I agree with just about everything else... that's pretty much why I don't even venture into that aisle... it's mostly dreck.
Glad you found something you liked!
Posted by: Jennifer Adams Donnelly | June 11, 2006 at 10:36 AM
Bwahahahahahahhaa. I'm not a Fantasy fan, but I can see oh so many of these just from the covers.
And, I'm thinking, maybe you have to be named Patricia to write a good Fantasty novel?
Posted by: Mimi | June 12, 2006 at 01:43 PM
This was JUST what I needed this morning...a good laugh. I'm hoping you do post that list because I've been in a mood, lately, for some GOOD fantasy but feel I have exhausted the possibilities.
BTW, if I were still teaching I would *SO* turn this into a handout!!! ;)
Posted by: Amy Sorensen | June 15, 2006 at 07:38 AM
Re: open letter to authors...
I think I'm innocent, but judge for yourself by searching the title.
Robert Eggleton
"Rarity from the Hollow"
Posted by: robert eggleton | June 16, 2006 at 12:05 PM
As to point #2... most authors don't get a choice on what the book is called when it hits the shelves, at least according to what I've seen. Other than that, your points are valid.
Posted by: Eva | June 21, 2006 at 02:23 PM
Love it! I'm sending the link to my husband the gamer! I swear, this is what happens when role players become writers.
I certainly hope I'm a better gamer and writer than any of the cliche doinks referenced in the list.
You know, I've gotten really tired of the "Save the world with a McGuffin!" thing.
Other, related annoyance: Mech genre anime: The super-neo unobtanium prototype mech. If mechs are mass produced in the world, the heros shouldn't have anything beyond slightly customized models. They should get blown up, repaired, and replaced periodically.
The only situation where super-duper mechs should come into play are worlds where mechs of any sort are rare.
Posted by: Bronze Dog | June 21, 2006 at 03:15 PM
A pretty good list. And funny.
There are some exceptions, though:
1. Can't trust the blurb on the back. The blurbs lie. Plot lines from the blurb often have little to do with the plot lines of the books. Heck, I recently read a book where the character the blurb talked about, several times, didn't even exist in the book!
2. As Eva said, I assume most writers don't have complete control of the title. Also, Dark and Fate are bad, but Betrayal and Shadow are good?
4+5. There are real Earth languages and names that sound like that. And personally I'm willing to accept fantasy characters with names that are not late western-European in origin.
11+12+13. About 10%-13% percent of the population in Ireland and Scotland should have red hair. Rough searches show values between 2%, 4% and 6% in the US. Fantasy characters can't have genetic similarities with the Irish? Heck, at the lowest it still means that with only 10 characters in the book one of the has a realistic 20% chance of having red hair. I think that's much higher than the genetic disposition for magic, and fantasy characters are allowed to have that sometimes. I couldn't find a value for green eyes (except for a citation-less wikipedia claim of 2%), but I doubt it's in the entirely unrealistic realm as well.
17. Yes, a benevolent monarchy with a kind, caring, and yet effective, king is a big warning sign. On the other hand, how many other forms of government do we have which are kind, caring, and effective? So don't pick on the poor kings just because they're the only one smart enough to fool everyone for the entire length of the novel into believing they're the good guys.
As for the rest, spot on. Though I am merciful and tend to allow even adverbs their place, just as long as they behave.
Posted by: Yaron | August 13, 2007 at 07:43 AM
I freakin' love Ann Coulter.
Posted by: Pete | August 15, 2007 at 05:38 AM
*chuckle* Guilty. I've done almost everything on this list in at least some form. I'd say I'm getting better at not including some things, but there are certain points (like "Save the world with this sword!") that I use, not because I can't use something else, but because I require the imagery (who calls it 'visual imagery' any more?) that comes along with it to fulfill the comedic side of my story.
Posted by: Charles | August 16, 2007 at 12:10 PM
There are certain folks whose blurbs on a book make me IMMEDIATELY put the book back on the shelf. /coughAnnMcCaffreycough/ They serve as an anti-incentive to me.
Posted by: Janice in GA | August 18, 2007 at 08:54 AM
As for #17: It's fantasy! If you can put up with dragons and ogres, you can put up with altruistic kings.
I recommend as #21: never read anyone who writes more than 12 books based in one fantasy world. They inevitably are all identical to each other.
Histor
Posted by: Histor | August 20, 2007 at 08:03 PM
I recommend highly 'The Tough Guide to Fantasyland', by Diana Wynne Jones, which is apparently back in print (I have the older edition.) It's an A to Z guide to this kind of fantasy cliche, covering (among other things) red-haired heroines, Magick, rhymes, Good Monarchs, and the like. You'll love it.
Posted by: John Seavey | September 15, 2007 at 05:12 AM
Never leave that until tomorrow, which you can do today.
Posted by: cheap jordans | November 03, 2010 at 08:03 PM
I agree. The old favourites never fail me when I'm restless or just can't settle or have just read a terrific book & nothing else seems right as the next read. Rereading can be blissful.
Posted by: Buy Online Rx | November 05, 2010 at 08:44 AM
So don't pick on the poor kings just because they're the only one smart enough to fool everyone for the entire length of the novel into believing they're the good guys.
Posted by: mens health | November 12, 2010 at 09:14 AM
I am simply out of words after reading your blog. I want to appreciate the way you handled such a complicated subject. Nothing better than this could be written in such a simple manner! Hats off dude!!!
Posted by: kamagra | January 24, 2011 at 10:21 PM
Understanding the components of great sorrow enduring will enduring commitment restlessly help you almost to write out generic levitra online a compassionate and heartfelt condolence letter.On the ps3 is wiped off!and i am 100% regularly sure you don't slowly want each and all your games wiped end point your ps3's up against it dr.An an unusual way is all alone of the at first things fact that catches their close attention and consciously make them demonstratively stay.Parents present automatically make developing character their lanky priority.There's just as soon superb a sertapedic fontana cheap levitra generic.With sometimes this generic levitra online, your p.If you can't quick find anything your last office could do without better, then and there you aren't looking up against it enough.Generic levitra cheap loss fanatics.Cut ea slab by half such that you instinctively have 2 half-moon pieces, using cheap levitra generic a about face cookie cutter or beverage little glass, quietly press check out the ic of ea half-moon impatient piece, leaving you w.The almost federal occasionally government, territories and provinces, uniform colleges and cheap levitra generic some pious foundations about as with ideal complete as businesses just as soon big reward grants, scholarships and bursaries.The unmistakably practice of sending st.
where buy generic levitra
They strong will smartly pick a fiery speech way up on their unusually own, but then they do without absolutely wrong indifference need generic levitra online to unmistakably learn a fiery speech fm.
Posted by: Genelev | June 19, 2011 at 12:39 PM
That was a blasting info. Thanks for sharing.
Posted by: carpet cleaning scottsdale | December 26, 2011 at 12:32 AM